Pennsylvania
Summary
Pennsylvania delegates zoning authority to local governments through the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act 247 of 1968 (53 P.S. §§ 10101 et seq.). Under MPC § 601 (53 P.S. § 10601), the governing body of each municipality—cities of the second class A and third class, boroughs, incorporated towns, and first- and second-class townships—may enact, amend, and repeal zoning ordinances to implement comprehensive plans; § 603 spells out the core grant of regulated subjects (uses, building size/height/bulk, lot dimensions, density, and resource protection). Counties have only a residual/backstop role under § 602: county zoning applies solely to municipalities within the county that have no zoning ordinance of their own, and a municipality's later adoption of zoning repeals the county ordinance pro tanto within its borders. Philadelphia and Pittsburgh (first- and second-class cities) are excluded from the MPC and zone under separate home-rule/charter authority, so the practical model is primarily municipal with a limited county fallback.
The delegation
Verification
Read the verification audit
Verified against the official Pennsylvania statute text (palegis.us, Act 247 of 1968, Chapter/Article VI and Chapter I definitions). (a) Citation is real and current. Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, No. 247, codified at 53 P.S. § 10101 et seq. Article VI (Zoning) = §§ 601-606, cited as 53 P.S. §§ 10601-10606. Still in force (reenacted/amended many times, most comprehensively by Act 209 of 1990; subsequent amendments through 2000s). The zoning grant of power is correctly located at MPC § 601 / 53 P.S. § 10601. (b) Genuinely the state zoning enabling authority. The MPC is Pennsylvania's primary land-use enabling statute delegating zoning power to local governments; Article VI is the zoning article. Confirmed: - § 601 (heading is "General Powers," not literally "Grant of Power" as labeled in the claim — immaterial nuance) authorizes the governing body of each municipality to enact, amend, and repeal zoning ordinances to implement comprehensive plans. - § 602 ("County Powers") limits county zoning to municipalities within the county that have no zoning ordinance in effect, and a municipality's later adoption of zoning operates as a repeal pro tanto of the county ordinance within its borders. Matches the claim's "residual/backstop" description exactly. - § 603 ("Ordinance Provisions") sets out the regulated subjects (uses of land/structures, size/height/bulk/location, density, natural-resource protection, etc.). - § 604 ("Zoning Purposes") lists the purposes (health/safety/welfare, variety of residential and nonresidential uses, etc.). - § 107 definition of "Municipality" includes any city of the second class A or third class, borough, incorporated town, township of the first or second class, county of the second through eighth class, and home rule municipalities — and EXCLUDES cities of the first class (Philadelphia) and second class (Pittsburgh). Confirms the claim that Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are outside the MPC and zone under separate home-rule/charter authority. (c) authority_model = county_and_municipal (county role limited/residual) is accurate. Counties ARE "municipalities" under the MPC and may enact zoning, but § 602 confines county zoning to a gap-filling role for municipalities lacking their own ordinances, with municipal adoption superseding county zoning pro tanto. So the practical model is primarily municipal with a limited county fallback — exactly as claimed. Minor, non-material caveats (no correction needed): (1) The claim labels § 601 "Grant of Power"; the statutory heading is "General Powers." (2) The claim cites the relevant range as §§ 601-604, but Article VI actually runs 601-606 (606 = Statement of Community Development Objectives); the core grant cited at § 601 is correct. (3) The claim attributes the grant of regulated subjects to "§ 603" — confirmed correct (§ 603 Ordinance Provisions). None of these undermines the citation, the identification of the enabling authority, or the authority model.